Civitas
+44 (0)20 7799 6677

Incitement to Murder Outside a Cathedral? Apparently Not, According to Met Police Chief

Civitas, 29 September 2006

Pope Benedict XVl delivered his controversial lecture at the University of Regensburg on Friday 15th September. His lecture was controversial because it included a quotation from a 14th century text that was highly critical of Islam.
The inclusion of that passage ignited massive protests around the world from Muslims who claimed that it had insulted their religion and its founding prophet. In the Middle East, churches were burnt in protest, and, in one north African country, a nun murdered in apparent retaliation for what the Pope had said.
Where there have been demonstrations against the Pope, some have merely demanded that he apologise for having insulted their religion. Others have gone further, calling for the Pope to be killed by way of punishment. Demonstrations of this latter sort arguably verge on incitement.
On the Sunday following the lecture, a widely reported demonstration against the Pope took place outside Westminster Cathedral at which various placards were displayed and slogans chanted that bordered on calling on Muslims to kill the Pope in revenge for including the quotation in his lecture.
This demonstration was well-attended by police who received a score of complaints from those attending the Cathedral service that morning who claimed to have been upset and intimidated by what they witnessed upon leaving it.
Although a spokesman for the CPS is reported to have not ruled out that some prosecutions may result from what was said at the demonstration, the Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Ian Blair is today reported as being satisfied none were.
He is reported as having said of the demonstration: ‘We are living in an angry time. It is the job of the Metropolitan Police to hold the line of free speech and it is a difficult line to hold. But in this particular case I am satisfied there were no offences committed by anybody.’
On the Sunday of the demonstration, a Catholic medical student living in London who keeps a blog attended the service in the Cathedral. This is what he posted about the demonstration that same day:
‘My family decided this Sunday to make the trip to Westminster Cathedral together. As we came out about 100 Islamists were chanting slogans such as “Pope Benedict go to Hell”, “Pope Benedict you will pay, the Muja Hadeen are coming your way”, “Pope Benedict watch your back”, and other pretty hateful things.
‘There were about 100 police around and about keeping an eye on things and video recording the protestors. I asked if they’d be prosecuted, and the policeman sounded edgey. He said they’d been warned about their behaviour already but arresting any of them might just fuel them up ever more.’
In light of this personal testimony, backed up by several photographs taken at the time by him and posted along with his account, presumably Sir Ian Blair’s denial that any offences were committed at the demonstration illustrates what sort of policing he had in mind for the capital on appointment when he introduced a new logo for the force which runs: ‘Working Together for a Safer London’.
That this form of policing may result in Rome or elswhere in the world becoming less safe is presumably of no concern to the Met.

2 comments on “Incitement to Murder Outside a Cathedral? Apparently Not, According to Met Police Chief”

  1. Pope Benedict made a reasonable speech, on a reasonable issue. Unfortunately, the western Yellow press took his comments out of context in order to bait under educated Muslims into frustration.
    Pope Benedict was asking for dialogue between Christianity and Islam so that we might discuss our perceptions of the One Lord.
    If it was attacking anyone it was attacking the west and our secular culture that is extraordinarily ignorant in issues of ethics and theology.
    It is a shame that the few religious people left wish to crucify fellow followers of God for the act of defending their faith…so what, so the Catholics had hurt feelings, boo hoo, does that really deserve the imprisonment of otherwise respectable citizens.
    I find it disgraceful that Christians should demand the suffering of others for a mere ‘speech crime’. nothing could be further from the teachings of Christ (who was crucified for the same).
    Perhaps this is an opportunity to ask why ethics is so poorly taught in school…and why the spurious course of ‘citizenship’ is taught for 45 minutes each week, brainwashing issues of obsequiance to the state, that we derive our rights from the state, that the Human Rights Act is not nonsense and that we must be terrified of the state.

  2. I agree entirely. However the rot set in under ‘conservatives’ who conveniently ignored the rule of law in 1984.
    Miners pickets were stopped illegally by a politicised police force. tThere were aspects of teh strike which havenot been fully revealed.
    Threats to order continued with the Ray Honeyford affair when blatant intimidation was allowed by a tory government. THis carried on with the Rushdie affair when again conservatives said nothing.
    CIvitas and its allies claim to be’conservative’ one minute then ‘liberal’ the next.
    NOw the position has been reached that whatever decision is taken will lead to serious public disorder.
    Liberals do not have the ability to face down the opposition in this case Islamists. hey rely selectively on the ‘rule of law’ being applied by the state.
    But it does not really work like that. As we are aabout to find out.
    Meanwhile Civitas has to decide which side it is on as society rapidly collapses.

Newsletter

Keep up-to-date with all of our latest publications

Sign Up Here